Jega had announced on Saturday that the elections originally
scheduled for February 14 and 28 would be held on March 28 and April 11.
Arguing that INEC was pressured to take the decision, Yusuf stated that
President Goodluck Jonathan had ‘vested interest’ in postponing the
elections. “We will resist any attempt to tamper with the current
composition of INEC,” he said. “The Coalition of Progressive Political
Parties is deeply disappointed by the decision of the Independent
National Electoral Commission, INEC, to postpone Nigeria’s general
election, scheduled since 13 months ago to commence of February 14,
2015.”
The postponement came in spite of the reaction of Nigerians rejecting
the idea when it was first mooted in the UK by Sambo Dasuki (Rtd), a
colonel and national security adviser to President Goodluck Jonathan,
about three weeks ago. “It will be recalled, the first reason given for
the postponement of the election by Col Dasuki was the low number of
distribution and collection of Permanent Voters Cards and the fear of
disenfranchisement of eligible voters.
“When it became clear, from the numbers released by INEC that this
reason will not fly, the NSA came up with another reason barely a day
before the National Council of State was to meet to consider the earlier
reason given in support of the postponement. “This time around, the NSA
disingenuously offered a different reason totally unrelated to the
first: ‘new developments’ related to the insurgency raging in the
north-east and the inability of the armed forces to provide security for
the election arising therefrom. The NSA, then, on behalf of the Service
Chiefs, asked INEC to “reschedule” the elections for at least the next
six weeks in the first instance, to enable the armed forces secure the
areas affected by the insurgency for the elections to hold.
“Both the first and the second reasons advanced by the NSA cannot
stand the test of scrutiny for the following reasons: “In its
fortnightly meeting with political parties and its public statements,
INEC had repeatedly and consistently expressed its readiness to conduct
the elections as earlier scheduled on the basis of the Permanent Voters
Card distributed and collected and the totality of its state of
preparedness to conduct the election up as recent as one week ago.
“According to INEC, 96% of the PVCs have already been produced and
distributed across the 36 states and the FCT while the rate of
collection stood at about 68% across board. “The balance of four percent
had also been produced and was being distributed for collection before
the election was to commence.
In the history of Nigeria’s election, there was never a time the
nation recorded anywhere up to 60% of voter turn out. “The insurgency in
the northeast had raged for over five years and the armed forces under
its Commander-in-Chief has been on the retreat in the last one year
leading to the loss of a total of 24 local government areas to the
insurgents in Adamawa, Borno and Yobe states. “These constitute three
percent of the total number of 774 LGAs in the country that are safe and
not threatened by insurgents and therefore not in any security zone.
“INEC had already designed a plan to enable over one million
Internally Displaced Persons from these 24 LGAs to cast their votes,
which plan was presented to and approved by stakeholders from the areas
concerned as recent as mid January, 2015.” The group maintained that
INEC, the NSA, the security forces and the president, commander-in-chief
of the armed forces have a responsibility to ensure the general
election holds on the rescheduled dates and must ensure that the new
dates are not rescheduled again, under any circumstance.
“Similarly, the handover date of 29th May 2015 is non negotiable and
must remain sacrosanct as any attempt to tamper with it will amount to
truncating our democracy and putting the peace, unity and political
stability of our nation at risk,” it said. “The composition of the
current INEC leadership must not be undermined or tampered with, as this
will constitute a deliberate attempt to undermine the election itself
and influence its outcome.”
No comments:
Post a Comment